![\"\"](\"https:\/\/lh6.googleusercontent.com\/-i4PYk7LV3BY\/TX7AXmB5kII\/AAAAAAAADGA\/EtTstDcLRDA\/s1600\/Oil-Exploration.jpg\")
So What is going on with Souedie Crude, or as it is often called, Syrian Heavy Crude? Syria says it will cut exports by 37%.<\/p>\nSo What is going on with Souedie Crude, or as it is often called, Syrian Heavy Crude? Syria says it will cut exports by 37%.<\/p>\n
[See addendum below]<\/p>\n
Western Powers are on the verge of announcing that they will boycott Syria’s Souedie Crude. This is a heavy grade crude that can only be refined in Italy, Holland, Spain and France.\u00a0 Other countries cannot pick it up because they do not have refineries that can deal with such heavy crude. Thus neither China, Iran or Russia can refine it so it is easy for the West to punish Syria in this way. No need for a unanimous Security Council Vote or EU vote.<\/p>\n
Ausama Monajed and a few other opposition activists in the West have been lobbying for this boycott as the easiest way to hurt the regime for some time.\u00a0 They argue that the money goes straight to the Prime Minister’s office and thus funds repression. Of course the counter argument is that all Syrian money goes to the government and is fungible.\u00a0 The less money the government has the less money will get to the people.<\/p>\n
Yesterday, Syria announced that it will cut daily exports of Souedie crude oil by 37%. Many people have asked why.<\/p>\n
More than half the output of Syrian Heavy Crude is processed in Syrian refineries, which can refine around 240,000 bpd, while some 150,000 bpd or around 6 tankers a month of mostly sour Souedie is exported mainly to Italy, the Netherlands, France and Spain. This accounts for why Syria is reducing its exports.<\/p>\n
But Iraq has just announced that it will supply Syria with extra oil to help it through this time of economic crises brought on by the political difficulties… The exact amount Iraq oil was not announced, but sources said it would be a “large” amount of oil.<\/p>\n
Why is Iraq doing this? One would presume that Iran will make it up to Iraq in some way. But more importantly, it proves that Iraq and Prime Minister Maliki are operating within the Northern Alliance of Iran, Iraq, Syria and Hizbullah, which\u00a0 has traditionally been opposed to Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the US.<\/p>\n
Where will Turkey fit into this? Only a few months ago, Turkey had positioned itself as the leader of the Northern Alliance. Today it looks like it has flipped and could decide that its future belongs back with Saudi Arabia, Israel and the Western Powers. Turkey has some hard strategic head scratching to do.<\/p>\n
Syria is proving that it still has some important allies and more resources than most people gave it credit for. This is going to be a long and drawn out struggle.<\/p>\n
If the West decides that by impoverishing the Syrian people if can turn them against the Syrian government, as it has tried to do in Iraq, Iran, Libya and Sudan, the battle will become ever meaner and surely Syrians will become poorer and less well fed. Whether poverty will promote democracy in the long run remains to be seen. Most political scientist would tell you that democracy needs a fatter middle class rather than a leaner one for best outcomes.<\/p>\n
Addendum<\/strong>: From Johnny West,\u00a0Submitted on 2011\/06\/30 at 2:09am (West is an oil expert with considerable experience in the region. I defer to his knowledge on oil matters.)<\/p>\n There are several things I don\u2019t understand about this post, Josh.<\/p>\n 1) I\u2019m surprised as a political scientist you state there is a counter argument that all funds go the Syrian government and are therefore fungible. That doesn\u2019t even happen in Norway, while Resource Curse literature is full of examples of how oil props up dictatorship precisely because it is much more fungible than revenues base on a tax base, say, which pass up through regular government ministries, are harder to spend with a lot more scrutiny attached. It\u2019s simply not accurate, and the argument that this 25% is much more important to the maintenance of the government\u2019s patronage networks than any other 25% of the budget stands.<\/p>\n 2) The Arabic quotation does not support your paraphrase. Sources didn\u2019t announce Iraq would supply oil. Unnamed sources said that Iraq \u201cintends to declare\u201d that they will supply. It\u2019s a small but important difference. \u201cWe will announce\u201d is different to \u201cWe announce\u201d \u2013 it means that even according to the unnamed and totally unidentified sources, we should believe it when we see it, and the edifice of analysis of what this means about Iraqi foreign policy and Turkey and so on\u2026 does not have a strong foundation.<\/p>\n 3) It\u2019s not clear that the changed shipping schedule is a Syrian reaction to some putative EU boycott. What would be the rationale behind it? It could be explainable by the idea that buyers are already deterred by what they see as impending sanctions, but it\u2019s hard to see what the Syrian government would gain by proactively cutting exports.<\/p>\n 4) If Syria exports less, it retains more oil in-country. Its issue then is with loss of foreign currency earnings. How does more oil coming into Syria from Iraq then help solve that issue? Is the suggestion that Syria then gets to re-sell the Iraqi oil and keep the money?<\/p>\n 5) When you use phrases like \u201cDecides to impoverish\u201d you\u2019re clearly comfortable attibuting motivation beyond established fact. Are you prepared to do the same then, with the regime and say that Bashar al-Assad \u201cdecided to kill\u201d large numbers of peaceful protesters? I think you ought to, for balance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n J.L. responds<\/strong>: As for using the word s”impoverish Syrians” \u00a0to describe the likely result of placing sanctions on Syria’s oil exports, I am not sure \u00a0why this is objectionable. The object of sanctions is to try to turn the people against their government as a way of getting the government to stop the objectionable behavior. The US has sanctioned Iran, Sudan, Libya, Iraq, and Syria to get them to change their behavior. This leads to a drop in GDP.<\/p>\n West wants me to then say that President Assad is killing demonstrators to get them to stop. Yes, Assad is killing demonstrators to get them to stop. The UN determined that sanctions on Iraq in the 1990s killed over 300,000 Iraqis. When Prime Minister Sharon of Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza, his political advisor explained that the Israeli government intended to put the Palestinians on a diet but not to starve them. It would be nice to think that cutting Syria’s oil revenue would only stop the regime’s ability to repress the uprising, as those pushing the boycott state, but this seems naive to me. The regime will not stop defending itself or send the army home if oil revenue shrinks. It will first stop subsidies and raise prices, which will hurt the poor and the most vulnerable. This is what happened in Iraq. This is what is happening in Iran. This is what happened in Sudan, and this is what has happened in Syria over the last two decades of US sanctions on Syria. None of these regimes have changed their behavior or ceased to engage in the behavior that the initiators of the sanctions objected to. What does happen is that the most vulnerable get poorer.<\/p>\n Syria to Cut Souedie Crude Daily Exports for July by 37%<\/a> Sytrol, Syria\u2019s state-run oil company, will cut daily exports of Souedie crude for loading in July from its Mediterranean port Tartous by 37 percent, according to a shipping schedule seen by Bloomberg News.<\/p>\n The July program for Souedie, also known as Syrian Heavy, comprises four 80,000-metric-ton cargoes and two shipments of 35,000 tons. That\u2019s equivalent to 2.7 million barrels, or 87,058 barrels a day, compared with 137,247 barrels a day in June.<\/p>\n The company will also ship one 80,000-ton consignment of Syrian Light in July from Banias terminal in the Mediterranean, one less than June. July\u2019s volume amounts to 601,600 barrels, or 19,406 barrels a day.<\/p>\n Souedie has a density of 24.1 degrees on the American Petroleum Institute scale and a sulfur content of 3.9 percent, while Syrian Light has 37.7 degrees of API density and is 0.74 percent sulfur, according to Energy Intelligence Group.<\/p>\n The conversion factor from a ton to a barrel is 6.92 for Souedie, and 7.52 for Syrian Light.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Turkey renews strategic ties with Israel ahead of showdown with\u00a0Syria<\/a><\/p>\n Sanctions on small producer Syria may buoy oil<\/a> (Reuters) – High world oil futures prices could rise yet further if the European Union puts sanctions on Syrian oil this week, although the country exports modest amounts and the quality is low, analysts and traders said.<\/p>\n “The physical market impact is very small. But the current futures market is bullish so even if 50,000 barrels per day (bpd) go out, prices will go ballistic,” an oil trader with a major bank said Thursday.<\/p>\n The European Union will discuss in Brussels Friday possible sanctions against Syria’s leadership over its crackdown on protesters, EU diplomats have said….<\/p>\n Syria’s two key production streams are the sour and heavy Souedie crude, which yields lower quality products, and the sweet and lighter Syrian Light grade.<\/p>\n
\nBy Sherry Su – Jun 28, 2011 10:11 AM CT<\/p>\n
\nBy Dmitry Zhdannikov and Ikuko Kurahone, LONDON | Thu Apr 28, 2011<\/p>\n