Egypt and KSA told Syria, if there is no president in lebanon,they will not attend the arab summit.

Majed,

Unlike the case of the hosts of the last Arab summit in KSA, and the summit in Annapolis, The Damascus summit hosts are not going to do much to satisfy any potential participants. Syria, as you know, always manged without the prestige tools.

Do you (or anyone here) know when was the last time the Arab summit was held in Damascus? or how many times it was held in Damascus since the Arab league was formed over 50 years ago?

It was formed in Cairo in 1945 with six members: Egypt, Iraq, Transjordan (renamed Jordan after 1946), Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Syria.

Here is the list of the location of ALL Arab summits the past 62 years:

1. Egypt Cairo: 13-17 Jan. 1964.
2. Egypt Alexandria: 5-11 Sep. 1964.
3. Morocco Casablanca: 13-17 Sep. 1965.
4. Sudan Khartoum: 29 Aug. 1967.
5. Morocco Rabat: 21-23 Dec. 1969.
6. Egypt Cairo (first emergency summit): 21-27 Sep. 1970
7. Algeria Algiers: 26-28 Nov.1973.
8. Morocco Rabat: 29 Oct. 1974.
9. Saudi Arabia Riyadh (2nd emergency summit): 17-28 Oct. 1976.
10. Egypt Cairo: 25-26 Oct. 1976.
11. Iraq Baghdad: 2-5 Nov.1978.
12. Tunisia Tunis: 20-22 Nov. 1979.
13. Jordan Amman: 21-22 Nov. 1980.
14. Morocco Fes: 6-9 Sep. 1982.
15. Morocco Casablanca (3rd emergency summit): 7-9 Sep. 1985
16. Jordan Amman (4th emergency summit): 8-12 Nov. 1987.
17. Algeria Algiers (5th emergency summit): 7-9 Jun. 1988.
18. Morocco Casablanca (6th emergency summit): 23-26 Jun. 1989.
19. Iraq Baghdad (7th emergency summit): 28-30 Mar. 1990.
20. Egypt Cairo (8th emergency summit): 9-10 Aug. 1990
21. Egypt Cairo (9th emergency summit): 22-23 Jun. 1996.
22. Egypt Cairo (10th emergency summit): 21-22 Oct. 2000.
23. Jordan Amman: 27-28 Mar. 2001.
24. Lebanon Beirut: 27-28 Mar. 2002.
25. Egypt Sharm el-Sheikh: 1 Mar. 2003.
26. Tunisia Tunis: 22-23 May. 2004.
27. Algeria Algiers: 22-23 Mar. 2005.
28. Sudan Khartoum: 28-30 Mar. 2006.
29. Saudi Arabia Riyadh: 27-28 Mar. 2007.

Our “strikingly attractive” Syrian friend Hind Kabawat is in the Financial Post today! : )

Alex,
So that means the Arab summit was never held in Damascus before, and Egypt and Saudi Arabia aren’t coming. How brotherly of them!
Anyway, I really wish they come, and I have to disagree with you (a little bit : )) on one thing; I think that Damascus will indeed try to get them to participate. It was always Damascus endeavor to bolster the ‘joint Arab efforts’. If they don’t pacify the demand of a president in Lebanon (which is quite understandable, given the fact that Syria doesn’t really pull all the strings), then they’ll at least use diplomacy and even pep-talk to engage the Saudi and the Egyptian.

Hind is indeed an impressive woman and an achiever. But Alex, where can one see or get involved in these inter-religious dialogues? I’ve been wishing to locate such channels and this seems to be quite interesting. Would really appreciate it if you post links to her forums.

Alex;
your list shows that this is the first time the summet is going to be held in Syria,there has to be a reason for this.
the economist says that 2009 will be bad year for Syria,economically,and politically,I heared reports that the oil will drop 20% in 2008, if USA start pull out of Iraq in 2008,the dollar will go up, I wonder what Ehsani will say.
I doubt Lebanon will stay without president through 2008, and the tribunal will convene in the end of it.

Alex,
So that means the Arab summit was never held in Damascus before, and Egypt and Saudi Arabia aren’t coming. How brotherly of them!
Anyway, I really wish they come, and I have to disagree with you (a little bit : )) on one thing; I think that Damascus will indeed try to get them to participate. It was always Damascus endeavor to bolster the ‘joint Arab efforts’. If they don’t pacify the demand of a president in Lebanon (which is quite understandable, given the fact that Syria doesn’t really pull all the strings), then they’ll at least use diplomacy and even pep-talk to engage the Saudi and the Egyptian. ….

Hind is indeed an impressive woman and an achiever. But Alex, where can one see or get involved in these inter-religious dialogues? I’ve been wishing to locate such channels and this seems to be quite interesting. Would really appreciate it if you post links to her forums….

Early reports on a possible consensus by the Arab Foreign ministers meeting in Cairo (including Syria) to call for the immediate election of Gen. Suleiman President of Lebanon without preconditions:

A matter-of-fact report from Naharnet is followed by what are claimed to be significant details in Al-Mustaqbal. I don’t see anything reported yet on almanar.com.lb, but Hezbollah representatives had earlier pre-judged any result that includes taking into consideration the participation (and hence opinion) of the Lebanese delegation as irrelevant because they don’t recognize the Lebanese government.

See below:

1) Naharnet –
http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/0/2062B9118C8AE077C22573C70070EF9C?OpenDocument

Arab League Appeals for ‘Immediate’ Election of Suleiman
Arab League foreign ministers on Saturday welcomed the consensus around army commander Gen. Michel Suleiman as a candidate for the presidency and called for his “immediate” election.
Amr Moussa made the announcement following a consultative meeting of foreign ministers gathering for an extraordinary meeting Sunday of the 22-member pan-Arab called to deal with Lebanon’s political crisis

“The ministers welcome favorably the consensus around Michel Suleiman as a candidate for the presidency and call for his immediate election in accordance with the constitution,” Moussa said.

He said Syria, long seen as a divisive influence on its neighbor, had backed the call. Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem had attended the consultative meeting.

On Friday the ruling March 14 coalition called on Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo on Sunday to protect Lebanon from what it said were Syrian attempts to block the long-overdue election of a new president.

Lebanon has been without a president since the mandate of pro-Syrian Emile Lahoud expired on November 23 amid sharp divisions between the ruling majority and the opposition, which is backed by Syria and Iran.(AFP-Naharnet)

Elections in Beirut’s parliament for a new president have been postponed 11 times, and the legislature is now due to meet again on January 12 to elect a head of state.

Beirut, 05 Jan 08, 23:36

2) Al-mustaqbal
http://www.almustaqbal.com.lb/storiesprintpreview.aspx?storyid=269139

وزير الخارجية القطري حمل معه من دمشق موافقة الأسد وعرضها على اجتماع خماسي

ولادة سريعة وبالإجماع لاتفاق عربي حول لبنان:
انتخاب سليمان “فوراً” مع كفة حكومية مرجّحة

المستقبل – الاحد 6 كانون الثاني 2008 – العدد 2840 –

القاهرة ـ جورج بكاسيني ورامي ابراهيم
بخلاف الكثير من التوقعات، وربما بشكل فاجأ اكثر المتفائلين بخروج اتفاق في اليوم الثاني لاجتماع وزراء الخارجية العرب في القاهرة، ولد اتفاق عربي سريع قضى بالدعوة الى انتخاب قائد الجيش العماد ميشال سليمان “فورا” وفقا للاصول الدستورية وان يكون له الكفة الراجحة في حكومة وحدة وطنية تؤلف في العهد الجديد.
وبنجاح المساعي العربية في التوصل الى صيغة الاتفاق هذه، والتي اجمع وزراء الخارجية عليها خلال اجتماع تشاوري مساء امس، بات الموضوع اللبناني خارج النقاش في اليوم الثاني للاجتماع الذي سيكرس كليا للموضوع الفلسطيني.
وتدعو هذه الصيغة التي صدرت ببيان رسمي مساء، الى انتخاب العماد ميشال سليمان رئيسا للجمهورية “فورا ووفقا للأصول الدستورية”، ومن ثم الاتفاق على تشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية “يكون لرئيس الجمهورية كفة الترجيح” فيها.
وعلمت “المستقبل” ان هذه الصيغة تم التوصل اليها خلال الساعات الماضية من خلال اتصالات شاركت فيها المملكة العربية السعودية ومصر وقطر والجامعة العربية، وان وزير الخارجية القطري حمد بن جاسم الذي زار دمشق امس حصل على موافقة الرئيس بشار الاسد على هذه الصيغة، لينضم فور وصوله الى القاهرة الى اجتماع سبق اللقاء التشاوري، وشارك فيه وزراء خارجية المملكة العربية السعودية الامير سعود الفيصل ومصر أحمد ابو الغيط وسوريا وليد المعلم وسلطنة عُمان يوسف بن علوي بالاضافة الى امين عام الجامعة العربية عمرو موسى.
وبناء على ذلك لم يستغرق اللقاء الوزاري التشاوري الذي بدأ قرابة الثامنة والنصف اكثر من ساعة، وانتهى بتبني كل رؤساء الوفود هذا البيان من دون ادخال اي تعديل عليه رغم مطالبة البعض بتعديلات طفيفة.
وأعلن موسى في مؤتمر صحافي عقب الاجتماع، أنه جرى خلال اللقاء الذي تم بدعوة منه وعقد في منزله مناقشة الوضع من منطلق أخوي.
ووصف اللقاء بأنه “كان طيبا للغاية حيث تحدث الجميع فيه من زواية كيف نحافظ على استقلال لبنان لتجاوز هذه الأزمة”. وقال: “دار التشاور في هذا اللقاء الأخوي.. عن بعض الموضوعات العربية الأخرى ومنها أساسا موضوع لبنان واتفقنا على هذا القرار”.
ووجه موسى التحية للدور الذى لعبه رئيس المجلس وزير خارجية الجزائر مراد مدلسي في تفهمه وتسهيله لهذا اللقاء، وموقفه البناء الذي ساعده كثيرا على تحقيق ما تم التوصل إليه.
وأوضح أنه تم الإتفاق على تخصيص جلسة اليوم لمناقشة الملف الفلسطينى ومتابعة عملية التفاوض بين الإسرائيليين والفلسطينيين فى ضوء استمرار عمليات الاستيطان الإسرائيلية.
وهنا النص الحرفي للبيان الختامي الصادر عن الاجتماع والذي قرأه موسى:
انعقد مجلس جامعة الدول العربية على المستوى الوزاري في دورة غير عادية يومي 5 و6/1/2008 للتباحث حول الوضع في لبنان في ظل خطورة استمرار الأزمة الحالية وتداعياتها على السلم الأهلي ومستقبل الأمن والاستقرار في لبنان.
وانطلاقاً من المسؤولية العربية تجاه لبنان واستمراراً للجهود العربية المبذولة للمساعدة على تجاوز الأزمة اتفق المجلس على ما يلي كخطة متكاملة يدعو كافة الأطراف المعنية في لبنان إلى التوافق عليها.
1 ـ الترحيب بتوافق مختلف الفرقاء اللبنانيين على ترشيح العماد ميشال سليمان لمنصب رئاسة الجمهورية والدعوة إلى انتخابه فوراً وفقاً للأصول الدستورية.
2 ـ الدعوة إلى الاتفاق الفوري على تشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية تجري المشاورات لتأليفها طبقاً للأصول الدستورية على ألا يتيح التشكيل ترجيح قرار أو إسقاطه بواسطة أي طرف ويكون لرئيس الجمهورية كفة الترجيح.
3 ـ يبدأ العمل على صياغة قانون جديد للانتخابات فور انتخاب رئيس الجمهورية وتشكيل الحكومة.
4 ـ تكليف الأمين العام، في ضوء ما تقدم، بإجراء اتصالات فورية مع جميع الأطراف اللبنانية والعربية والاقليمية والدولية، وله أن يستعين بأي مسؤول عربي للمساعدة في هذا الشأن.
5 ـ يتم عرض نتائج هذه الجهود والاتصالات في اجتماع مستأنف لمجلس الجامعة على مستوى وزراء الخارجية يعقد يوم 26 كانون الثاني (يناير) 2008.
وكالة الانباء السورية (سانا) ذكرت ان موسى اطلع رئيس مجلس النواب نبيه بري على البيان. كما ابلغه في اتصال هاتفي الليلة الماضية بوصول وفد من الجامعة العربية الى بيروت الاربعاء المقبل لمتابعة تطورات الاوضاع في لبنان.
ونقلت الوكالة نفسها عن المعلم تأكيده خلال مداخلة في الاجتماع حرص سوريا على دعم توافق اللبنانيين على خطة متكاملة تمكنهم من تجاوز الازمة التي يمر بها لبنان ودعم الاجماع العربي الذي تم التوصل اليه بعد المشاورات التى جرت وتم التعبير عنها في البيان”. وشدد على “اهمية التوافق بين اللبنانيين”، معربا عن امله في “نجاح مهمة الامين العام وان لا يؤدي اي اقتراح الى تعطيل العمل الحكومي مستقبلا”.

HP

This could be very significant.

I think this is a great way out of the problem.

Basically, the president wins much more power … he has a number of ministers (appointed by him) who will make sure that

1) the majority (Seniora) does not have 2/3 as they wanted and

2) the opposition does not have the 1/3 they wanted

Not what Hizbollah wanted, and not what Hariri wanted … they both do not have enough power to force their agenda on the other side … only the President has that new power which is … a modification to Taif !

The Christians win. The Shiites (Hizbollah) should be able to live with it even though they are not overly empowered through this arrangement (which makes them less perceived as a threat to the M14 group) and Syria gets its favorite man as President (General Sleiman) without worrying about a Seniora government that can be a threat to Syria.

Herald Tribune

And in Arabic the full resolution

And Syria wins. They got their man (Sleiman) to be the most powerful man in Lebanon … they did not disappoint Aoun (they did not sell him easily) and they weakened and constrained the Saudi (Sunni) power in Lebanon … without allowing Hizbollah to grow too powerful.

Isn’t that exactly what Syria wanted in the first place?

On top of that it looks like Syria was flexible.

Alex,

Your analysis is on the mark. This is effectively the virtual undoing of the Taif accord. The power swings back to the Christian President.

Damascus played this chess game superbly. It agreed on the deal without seemingly being pressured by France or the U.S. It showed that it is only its leadership that can swing the vote. Its foreign minister stated that it supports a President for Lebanon “fawran…immediately”.

The U.S. has redefined victory in Lebanon in the election of a President there. It can now claim it won.

France has spent so much energy but won little publicly for this final resolution. Damascus upstaged it and won the publicity game as well.

Saudi seems to have agreed to yield more powers to the President’s office. Hariri does not have much to show for his efforts. Like Bush, his victory has been redefined as pushing for the election of Michele Suleiman. I guess he too can claim he won.

The Christians of Lebanon can thank Bashar but they will not of course. Events were moving beyond their direct control or understanding of the bigger picture encircling the region.

Regardless of who won or lost though, this is a major victory and breakthrough for the region.

Well, my friends, let’s hope this is indeed the beginning of the end, i.e., the (finally!) deflation of the Lebanese crisis. Regardless of how the developments are spun by this or that as their victory, I just pray that deflation does indeed happen. All’s well that ends well and, speaking for myself, I really don’t care who gets the credit. [And judging by your prediction, it sounds like everyone will claim success].
The majority of Lebanese – as, I guess, every majority – are the silent majority who just want to be able to go to their jobs, work hard at advancing their status. I hope they will soon be given the chance to do this more effectively than the current conditions permit.

Now (to keep things interesting), the zinger question:
Is it in anyone’s interest to foil this agreement ? if so, who ? and why ?

HP

Hizbollah will be barely able to accept it .. but I hope they will.

The Saudis will realize that this is taking Lebanon to pre-Taif status … but given the available options they have today, it is hopefully not considered a big damage, especially that it was orchestrated in a meeting of Arab foreign ministers in which they played a role … so they surely did not look like outsiders.

The ones you might want to worry about are the smaller parties … the fanatic small parties or groups … whatever they believe in, their role disappears when there is an agreement in Lebanon .. they will oppose any agreement, then they will find a reason why they want to oppose it.

Jumblatt? Geagea? … I think they will be ok. I hope … this is not “a Win” for the opposition.

Jumping the gun as always. Neither the Syrians nor Hariri are going to elect Suleiman before he says which ministers he plans to appoint. This is far from over. In fact, it is not a solution at all, it pushes the problem downstream a little. Next fight will be about who the presidential ministers are.

Oh, and we haven’t heard Aoun, “the negotiator of the opposition” agree to this.

AIG,

You sound disappointed a bit.

What would YOU like to see as a solution that you think everyone will accept in Lebanon?

One-man-one-vote democracy?

FYI, they proposed for the new government to start working immediately for a more permanent “solution” … through reforming the elections law

كما دعا البيان الاطراف اللبنانية كافة الى الاتفاق الفورى على تشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية على الا يتيح التشكيل ترجيح قرار أو اسقاطه بواسطة أي طرف وان يكون لرئيس الجمهورية كفة الترجيح بالاضافة الى العمل على صياغة قانون جديد للانتخابات فور انتخاب رئيس للجمهورية وتشكيل الحكومة

It’s so nice to watch people with no understanding of what they’re talking about congratulate themselves over not understanding what they’re talking about.

Alex ,
Didn’t Lahoud have minsters in the goverment who ended up in Hariri’s pocket?.

Hi G, now your post is rather amuzing (and I’m just kidding you – so don’t take it seriously):
1- you’re reading people here, not waching them
2- I read your sentence several times, scratched my head a few times, and I still have absolutely no idea which people you mean. Is it AIG, me (the honorable HP), Alex ? I really don’t know (unless I should have studied all previous posts for a few weeks … which would be too much work)

Alex,
A one man one vote in Lebanon would be the best solution and I am all for it even if it means Hizballah takes over Lebanon. It is the right thing to do.

Norman,

Good point, but this is a solution for the current situation … later, they will work on the new elections law and new elections will take place in less than two years.

By then the world will be a different place.

We will worry about who can buy the loyalty of Sleiman’s ministers when we get there : )

I think Sleiman will pick the most Salim Hoss-like characters.

The big question is … who will be the Prime minister!

Alex ,
I have faith in Syria’s forign policy.
I hope i am right.

اتفاق بين الوزراء العرب بالإجماع يصدر اليوم في القاهرة :‏
سلة متكاملة : انتخاب سليمان رئيساً والصوت المرجح له في الحكومة
موسى يتابع التنفيذ والاجتماع الثاني في 27 الشهر الجاري‏

اتفق وزراء الخارجية العرب بالاجماع على بيان مشترك سيصدر اليوم يتضمن النقاط الاتية:‏
‏1 – الحل في سلة متكاملة تضمنها الدول العربية بالاجماع.‏
‏2 – يتابع التنفيذ ويحضر له امين عام الجامعة العربية عمرو موسى، ويرفع تقريره الى ‏المؤتمر الثاني لوزراء الخارجية العرب الذي سيعقد في 27 الجاري.‏
‏3 – الحل يتضمن انتخاب العماد سليمان رئيساً للجمهورية وتشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية، ‏ويكون الصوت المرجح للعماد سليمان، وبذلك يكون الثلث الضامن مؤمناً للمعارضة، ‏والثلثان لاجتماع الحكومة مؤمنان للاكثرية من اجل حصول الاجتماعات، وبالتالي يكون الضامن ‏هو رئيس الجمهورية العماد سليمان.‏
‏4 – يؤدي هذا الحل الى تعزيز وضع رئيس الجمهورية وبذلك تكون شروط المعارضة والاكثرية ‏مؤمنة من خلال وضع الارجحية والقرار في يد رئيس الجمهورية ما يعني الغاء النواقص في اتفاق ‏الطائف واعادة الضمانة والصلاحيات لرئيس الجمهورية ولكن كعرف وليس كنص، وعلى اساس ان ‏يتفق اللبنانيون لاحقا على الموضوع.‏
وتقول المعلومات ان الخروج باتفاق يعود الى اعطاء مصر والسعودية ضمانة حول الموضوع، ‏فيما كانتا في السابق لم تقدما اي ضمانة، وان الامين العام للجامعة العربية عمرو موسى ‏مكلف بتنفيذ هذه الضمانة، وتضيف المعلومات انه اذا لم يؤخذ في المستقبل بهذه الضمانات ‏فإن الاتفاق لا يعود قائماً.‏
وليلاً علمت «الديار» بالنقاط التي يتضمنها مشروع البيان بالتفصيل وهي كالآتي :‏
‏1 – الترحيب بتـوافق جميع الفرقاء اللبنانيين على ترشيح العماد سليمان لرئاسة الجمهورية ‏والدعوة لانتخابه فوراً.‏
‏2 – تشكيل حكومة لبنانية جديدة بعد الانتخابات الرئاسية تبعا للنصوص الدستورية ‏اللبنانية.‏
‏3 – العمل على انجاز قانون جديد للانتخابات النيابية.‏
‏4 – تكليف الامين العام للجامعة العربية عمرو موسى بمتابعة تنفيذ بنود هذا الاعلان.‏
‏5 – يعقد الاجتماع التالي في 27 الجاري لتقييم نتائج التحرك واتخاذ المواقف اللازمة بشأنه.‏
وكانت قد رجحت مصادر مطلعة نهار امس ان يكون البند المتعلق بحكومة الوحدة الوطنية ‏يتضمن حكومة من 30 وزيراً يكون فيها 10 للموالاة و10 للمعارضة و10 لرئيس الجمهورية.‏

توجهت الانظار الى القاهرة حيث ينعقد مؤتمر وزراء الخارجية العرب لمناقشة الازمة السياسية ‏اللبنانية وامكان ايجاد حل لها في ظل تصلب الاطراف اللبنانيين كل على مواقفه.‏
وعلمت «الديار» ان اتصالات مكثفة يقوم بها رئيس المخابرات المصرية اللواء عمر سليمان مع ‏السعودية وسوريا، حيث زار الرياض منذ ايام واجرى اتصالات مع عدد من المسؤولين السوريين ‏لترطيب الاجواء وللتأكيد ان المؤتمر سيعتمد صيغة اللاغالب واللامغلوب في لبنان.‏
وتقول هذه المعلومات ان ما يمكن ان يتوصل اليه وزراء الخارجية العرب هو اعلان الدعوة ‏للاسراع في انتخاب العماد ميشال سليمان رئيسا للجمهورية ومن ثم تشكيل حكومة حيادية تمهد ‏للانتخابات النيابية عام 2009 للحفاظ على صيغة اللاغالب واللامغلوب.‏
الى ذلك، فقد وجهت كل من المعارضة والموالاة رسائل الى امين عام الجامعة العربية لشرح ‏مواقفهما، فالاكثرية اعتبرت ان لبنان يواجه مشروع انقلاب على السلطة والنظام مدعوما من ‏سوريا وايران وتطالب الوزراء العرب بوضع حد لهذا الامر.‏
أما المعارضة، فتقول المعلومات ان الرسالة التي وجهت الى المؤتمر وجهها العماد عون وتتضمن ‏موقف المعارضة بالتفصيل من الازمة، وتدعو وزراء الخارجية العرب للتعاطي بايجابية مع هذه ‏الورقة.‏
وتضيف المعلومات ان المعارضة تهيىء لتحرك جدي وليس للتهويل، في اطار تدريجي اذا لم يتم في ‏القاهرة التعامل بحيادية او اذا لم تكن هناك مبادرة جدية تجاه لبنان.‏
وفي هذا الاطار، فقد عبّر حزب الله عن موقفه وقال ان المشاركة هي استفزاز ولن نعترف بالوفد ‏الحكومي وما يمثل، ولسنا ملزمين بما يقوله هذا الفريق ولا بما سينتج من المؤتمر.‏
بري: لا خيار الا بتوافق اللبنانيين
جدد رئيس مجلس النواب نبيه بري عشية اجتماع وزراء الخارجية العرب التأكيد على نظرية ‏الـ «س. س» اي تحسين العلاقات السورية – السعودية، مشددا على اهمية تحقيق هذا الامر ‏وانعكاسه على لبنان.‏
واكد مرة اخرى ان لا خيار ولا خلاص الا بالتوافق اللبناني، موضحاً انه في حال لم يتمكن ‏العرب من تحقيق وذلك فان على اللبنانيين انفسهم ان يحققوا هذا الوفاق.‏
وقال امام زواره امس ان المطلوب اجماع عربي لانقاذ لبنان، مشيراً في هذا المجال الى ما قدمه ‏لبنان في سبيل العرب.‏
وحذر بري من التدويل واللجوء الى هذا الخيار، معتبراً انه يعني المزيد من السلبية والخراب.‏
من جهة اخرى كشفت مصادر مطلعة لـ «الديار» عن تقرير ديبلوماسي حول المبادرة والمساعي ‏الفرنسية الاخيرة، ان مصادر ديبلوماسية فرنسية اشارت في التقرير الى الاتفاق الذي حصل في ‏الاجتماع الشهير بين الرئىس بري والنائب سعد الحريري بحضور وزير الخارجية الفرنسي برنار ‏كوشنير، والذي نص على:‏
‏- تشكيل حكومة الوحدة الوطنية على اساس تمثيل الكتل البرلمانية في المجلس النيابي.‏
‏- اعتماد القضاء دائرة انتخابية بالاضافة الى انتخاب العماد ميشال سليمان رئيسا ‏توافقياً للبلاد.‏
أبو الغيط
من جهته، فقد اكد وزير الخارجية المصري احمد ابو الغيط ان انتخاب رئيس جديد للجمهورية ‏في لبنان يشكل في الوقت الراهن اولوية قصوى وينبغي ان يسبق المناقشات حول القضايا ‏الاخرى التي تحتاج الى توافقات.‏
المعلم
وفي هذا الاطار، اكد وزير خارجية سوريا وليد المعلم ان سوريا ستسعى مع الاشقاء العرب ‏لتشجيع اللبنانيين من اجل التوصل الى حل يجنب لبنان هذا الوضع ويعيد المؤسسات الدستورية ‏الى العمل، سواء الرئاسة والحكومة ومجلس النواب.‏
وقال لاريجاني خلال لقائه المعلم ان ايران تدعم الجهود السورية من اجل التوصل الي حل ‏توافقي لازمة الانتخابات الرئاسية في لبنان.‏
بوش
وفي اطار الضغوط التي تمارسها الادارة الاميركية على سوريا والمعارضة اللبنانية، فقد اتهم ‏الرئيس الاميركي جورج بوش سوريا بانها مسؤولة عن الازمة السياسية التي تمنع لبنان من ‏اختيار رئيس جديد، واكد انها تعرقل ارادة الشعب اللبناني.‏
وقال بوش انه من الضروري توجيه رســالة الى الــسوريين: تســتمرون معزولين، وتســتمر ‏النــظرة اليكم على انكم دولة تعرقل الحل، وان جهودنا ترمي الى اقــناع الاخرين بان ‏عليهم الاستمرار في ممارسة الضغط على سوريا حتى يمكن ان تحرز العملية السياسية في لبنان ‏تقدماً.‏

——————————————————————————–
العودة الى القمة

I wonder why the French are under the impression that everything is gonna be fine in Lebanon (i.e. nor more political hassle, nor more factional bickering) once a president is elected.

This agreement, as promising and satisfying as it seems, will only have a sedative effect for the time being. There will still be struggle over what’s supposed to happen in the morning after.

“Moussa … said the foreign ministers called “for an immediate agreement on the formation of a national unity government” in Lebanon, constructed in such a way as to deny either faction the right to impose their policies on the other side.”
Naharnet

In other words, “veto power”?

Alex,

Before you pat yourself on the back and walk up to the drinks cabinet to pour yourself a celebratory drink, consider 2 points:

1) When has a solution by the Arab League ever been implemented (apologies if this point has already been made)?
2) Most importantly for you: does the Syrian regime REALLY know Gen. Suleiman? Much has passed between 1998 and 2007. Norman rightly raised the point about Lahoud ministers ending up on Hariri’s payroll. If there’s one thing you can rely on it is the smell of money turning a Lebanese minister’s head and sending him weak at the knees. Could this also be true of Suleiman?

Check this, for selling out:

http://www.al-watan.com/data/20080106/innercontent.asp?val=outstate3_2

P.S. The opposition will accept this Arab League plan knowing that M14 can’t accept it because its masters in the US don’t only want Hizbullah not to play any role in the government; they want Hizbullah to be seen to be defeated. The US is settling its 1985 score, and Hizbullah most be politically defeated first and then eventually militarily.

One should not ignore the timing of this Lebanon news which has coincided with the imminent arrival of President Bush to the region.

Syria and Iran can now deflect any criticism by Bush and may even have him thanking them for helping carve out a deal. For the American President to have arrived in the region without having a Lebanese President elected was going to be an embarrassment that he could have done without. The pressure on Saudi, Egypt and Qatar to help find a deal in time must have been intense. One would suspect that Bashar was fully aware of this and was able to extract the most concessions by waiting for the last minute.

I agree with Ehsani, the last minute rush to concoct a deal was remarkable!
We usually have the intuition that Arab League’s communiqués are worthless, but for some vague reason (not very vague actually!), this agreement seems to hold some backbone to itself.

GG, Hizbollah can’t be defeated passively. Whether politically or otherwise.
And it’s too strong internally to be trumped by its rivals, and the Lebanese status is so brittle that an external intervention will most likely break the doors of hell loose (i.e. civil war).

One would suspect that Bashar was fully aware of this and was able to extract the most concessions by waiting for the last minute.

Right, which is why the Arab statement nixed the Syrian demand of a veto power for Hezbollah and its friends and essentially adopted the position that March 14 has been advocating for weeks regarding the make-up of the next cabinet.

Like I said, people who understand nothing congratulating themselves over not understanding anything.

Offended,

I agree with all you say, but I don’t understand your point.

I feel that the Arab League plan, believe it or not, is a genuine attempt to solve a problem amicably. If it weren’t it would have leant more towards M14, which is what Saudi Arabia was pushing for in order to maintain Sunni power and containment of the Shia.

The US wants Hizbullah defeated even if it has to destroy Lebanon to do so. If not, why did the US administration not pressure Israel to stop bombing Lebanon, instead Rice went on about the “birth pangs of democracy.”

Ehsani,

This plan was not drafted because of the US, but in spite of it. Do you really believe the US will be happy with it? Of course not! If the US administration had any desire for a genuine settlement in Lebanon it would not have sent Welch to Lebanon to scupper the French brokered deal, and President Bush would not have gone on TV to openly declare that he is willing to recognise a Lebanese president elected outside of the constitution. This is not what the US wants and they will pressure M14 to knock it back.

Ehsani,

Some people are waiting for your comments on the actual post from the Economist on Syria’s economic outlook. I’m not one of them 😉

G,

If it makes you feel better, sure … why not. M14 won everything they wanted in this deal and the stupid, intellectually-challenged Syrians were taught a lesson they will never forget. I still like it and I hope it works out great for everyone in Lebanon.

GG,

This was not simply a meeting of the foreign ministers of the Arab league. A serious deal was reached, at the regional and at the Lebanese levels. Here is what happened:

1) Prime minister of Qatar visited Bashar in Damascus the day before

2) Foreign ministers of KSA, Egypt, Qatar and Syria met in Moussa’s house. That’s where the final agreement was reached. At first Saud al-faisal told Mouallem that Syria’s allies are asking for the undoable and that Saudi Arabia (and Egypt) are not going to be attending the Arab Summit if Syria does not help convince her allies to reduce their demands (Which implies that KSA and Egypt WILL attend the Arab summit in Damascus now). Then, Moussa suggested a compromise .. which I suspect he knew already from the Qatari prime minister who was in Damascus earlier, that Syria will accept.

3) They called Seniora to inform him of the deal they reached (to inform him) and and he replied “I completely welcome” the agreement.

4) Hizbollah people were contacted and they expressed a similar opinion. But I have not heard a clear statement from Nasrallah yet.

As I said earlier, I expect that Hizbollah will require some clarification behind the scene when Mouallem comes back … this agreement is borderline acceptable to them. Although I tend to think that wen the Iranian envoy was in Damascus that day and gave his blessing to “Syria’s efforts to settle the conflict in Lebanon” that Hizbollah took part in the decision to go along with the eventual Arab League formula.

5) Saad Hariri called this agreement “Noble and Historic” .. that’s good enough I assume.

6) Nothing yet from Junblatt and Geagea. They also will need to hear some details from Tareq Mitri when he comes back to Beirut.

Before the Arab league meeting, M14 figures asked Arab ambassadors (Egypt etc) to take firm actions to punish Syria. Similar escalation came from the opposition side. Lebanese Information Minister held a news conference in which he compared the tense situation in Lebanon to that which preceded the assassination of Rafiq Hariri and expressed his worries that similar bloodshed might be ahead for Lebanon if an agreement is not reached.

Most likely we will see many new difficulties. But whatever the extent of the influence of outsiders (Syria and KSA at a direct level, then the United States and Iran behind them) an agreement was reached on the outside after consulting with their allies on the inside. We will now find out if the Lebanese themselves are to blame for their own problems or not.

AND … I hope that with the Lebanese challenge being under control, the region will be able to survive the rest of term of this American administration that refuses to speak to Syria. The problem with reaching an agreement with Lebanon is that it had a deadline attached to it … a president for Lebanon needed to be elected and that was looking impossible at some point without a way for America and Syria to talk (and Saudi Arabia and Syria to talk). The other regional issues could wait if necessary for the next administration to start with a clean sheet.

Prime minister of Qatar, then Saud alFaisal, and Mouallem talked for few hours and they managed to solve a problem. I wonder what Sarkozy, and those who advise America not to talk to Syria, will say about giving up on talking to the Syrians.

Dear G,

You should be very happy then. March 14th got everything it wanted.

When you negotiate, you ask for the moon and then settle for what you think you could get. Having HA ask for the veto power and then step in to “pressure” them into accepting a deal is tactic that you don’t seem to fully appreciate.

Anyway, Syria was brought to its knees and yielded to pressure. I guess this is what you want to believe. If that makes you sleep better tonight, so be it.

Let us agree that this is good for the region and for Lebanon in particular.

Alex,

I admire your optimism, but I’d like to make two points:

1) I still think you imbue Syria with more influence over Hizballah than she actually has. You translated Hassan Nasrallah’s interview yourself:

‘He was asked if Syria CAN apply pressure? .. he said: “They can as friends ask us to do things as a favor for them, yes. This is Syria, not Cyprus”’

If the terms of this deal are not in Hizballah’s interest do you think he’ll subjugate his party’s interest to those of Syria?? I may be wrong, but I think you have a lack of understanding of Hassan Nasrallah as a person and Hizballah as a party. Nasrallah will listen to Syria’s opinion (as would any other politician meeting with his ally), but at the end of the day he’ll do what’s good for his party and community.

2) You seem to have discounted the opinion of Nasrallah’s other allies, particularly Aoun. Do you think he would agree to something if Aoun doesn’t agree to it? Nasrallah has tried and succeeded in nurturing a “my word is my bond” image, if he agrees to something without the support of his allies he would be shooting his credibility, both in Lebanon and the Middle East. He spent the past year accusing Hariri and Jumblatt of stabbing him in the back (if I remember he mentioned this too in the interview), how would stabbing his allies in the back look to Nasrallah’s supporters. Remember image is very important to Hizballah! Plus Aoun is popular among the Shia.

Many details need to be addressed before the fat lady sings. The three points are to use the constitutional means to elect Suleiman, to use the constitutional meas to form a unity goverment in which the President will have the final casting vote and the appointment of his ministres, and there will be a new electoral law. This is the undoing of Taif, it also opens the door for better representation of the Shia community and makes the President ( a pro Syria ) the king maker. Siniora showed how sovereign his goverment is by accepting this formula at once, HA has agreed on principle that this forms a new beginning and they are studying its merits. Geaga, Aoun, and Jumblatt have not had a major say in it yet. The key is what will Bush do now? The next few days will be very interesting.

GG

The mood in Lebanon (among the journalists and politicians at least) is very positive and upbeat.

It will be quite a disappointment if Aoun or Nasrallah today showed up on TV and ruined the party. I seriously doubt they will do that.

Besides, many Hizbollah figures already appeared to give their support. they are not as enthusiastic as others, but they are already showing good signs.

My guess is that Nasrallah and Aoun will not announce their full support until they make sure Eliot Abrams will not call Jumblatt and Geagea ad ask them to sabotage it.

Syria and Iran seem to be reasonably confident at this point given Saudi and Egyptian guarantees they received.

But of course nothing is final … it remains to be seen if any of the valid reasons you mentioned could derail the reconciliation process.

As for Nasrallah … you might want to know that a friend of mine who just came from Syria told me that in a Christian village near Tartous, he found that Nasrallah’s picture is on many walls in those villagers’ homes.

The Syrians do not impose anything on him and certainly do not take him for granted. But they both understand each other’s needs and goals, and they never stabbed each other in the back … unlike the participants of most other shifting alliances in the Middle East.

If the Syrians said yes this week, they know that there is a very good chance Nasrallah will say yes.

Alex,

“It will be quite a disappointment if Aoun or Nasrallah today showed up on TV and ruined the party. I seriously doubt they will do that.”

You’ll get no argument from me! In fact if you look at the 9th comment up from yours you’ll read that I write, “The opposition will accept this Arab League plan…” It gives the opposition basically what it wants. In fact I’m sure that when Egypt’s foreign minister met with Aoun last Friday he put the outlines of the plan to him to gauge his reaction. Moreover, Gebran Bassil welcomed it as a positive step, and MP Ali Hassan Khalil said that the plan is what the opposition has been asking for, but that the split should be 10 ministers for opposition, 10 for M14 and 10 for the president.

My point is that the devil’s in the detail and if the detail is not to Hizballah’s liking then all Syria can do is walk away saying,”We did what you asked of us and there’s nothing more we can do.”

“My guess is that Nasrallah and Aoun will not announce their full support until they make sure Eliot Abrams will not call Jumblatt and Geagea ad ask them to sabotage it.”

I think the opinion of these two is irrelevant at this point!

this is the time for Geagea,Nasrallah,to stay quiet, waiting for the others to speak first. I am not optimistic, yet.Lebanese president is not appointed by Arab League,but by the lebanese parliament.

[…] This al-Nahar article in Arabic spells out the deal as follows: […]